🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Route

Araghchi is treading a complex path since Iran does not want be seen to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that ended with the US president declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states exercised their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if talks resume.

The US president in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He said the assaults began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently sought to impose their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and continues the primary resolution to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be followed."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the nation in the wake of this invasion."